| Main Index Search Profile Send Private Check Private Who's Online Elements Table FAQ No Encryption Logout | ||||
| 17 Online, 3702 Registered | You have 0 new messages | |||
...we're
back!
|
| Novel Discourse | Previous thread Forum index Threaded Next thread | ||
| All 22 posts | ||
| Subject | safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | Chinaman (Stranger) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-06-01 08:12 | ||||
| Post No | 182458 | ||||
Im having a little debate in my head could one go about throwing safrole and CH3NH2 into a bomb to yield mdma without first converting safrole into bromosafrole or mdphenacetone? greatly appriciate any input into my delema Remember its illegal we have to get rid of it... puff puff puff |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | psychokitty (Hive Bee) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-06-01 08:23 | ||||
| Post No | 182461 | ||||
No. Not yet, at least. --PK |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | PolytheneSam (Master Searcher) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-06-01 11:05 | ||||
| Post No | 182501 | ||||
Some one I know tried it with 40% methylamine solution, sassafras oil (without purification), a drop of sulfuric acid as catalyst and some transition metal salts as catalyst based on US patent 4937383. This patent only gives examples of reactions using isobutene, but it looks like it follows Markonikoff's law where if you add R-H across a double bond, the R group goes to the carbon with the least hydrogen atoms. He tried smoking the residue after the reaction and then later he tried it orally after letting it air out for a while and he found it to be psychoactive. He saw the brightest colors he ever saw, experienced euphoria and an MDA like high which he was familiar with before. So if that test was good enough I would say that yes it will work. I don't know what the yields are. The sassafras oil was at least 25 years old but still had a very strong safrole smell to it. You can look up US patent 4937383 using this web page: http://www.geocities.com/dritte123/PSPF. http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6 http://www.privacy.org/ |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | Chinaman (Stranger) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-06-01 20:54 | ||||
| Post No | 182574 | ||||
Thanks man yea i was thinking about Markonikoff's law that the radical would attach to the most stable carbon and the secondary C group looks to be the most stable Thanks again ill have to follow up on the link and do some more research My cat keeps talking to me. Should i answer or or finish eating this piece of paper? |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | foxy2 (Hive Addict) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-07-01 04:58 | ||||
| Post No | 182603 | ||||
Sams the MAN Sams the MAN Sams the MAN Sams the MAN Sams the MAN Sams the MAN Thanks for all the kick ass patent work Sam!!! Do Your Part To Win The War |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | PolytheneSam (Master Searcher) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-08-01 03:17 | ||||
| Post No | 182689 | ||||
I think Chem_Guy was the first one to post things about direct amination. He listed one or two patents in his thread. Here's a list of patents on direct amination of alkenes. 2397705 2501509 2501556 2518528 2627526 2984687 4454321 4827031 4929758 4937383 5107027 5900508 http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6 http://www.privacy.org/ |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | jim (Hive Bee) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-08-01 07:48 | ||||
| Post No | 182755 | ||||
Funny, I tryed posting in this thread yesterday, but I guess it never went thru.... ? I thought that the high temperatures of this patent would cause isomerization of the allylbenzene double bond forming a propylbenzene. The patent does seem to put the amination with a Markinokov addition (nulcleophile to the most substituted carbon). Which means that the amination works for only allylbenzenes like safrole (if at all). If you want I can dregde up my old articles and threads, but I think it is all on my website ( http://chemguy.homestead.com/ ) |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | PolytheneSam (Master Searcher) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-08-01 09:09 | ||||
| Post No | 182775 | ||||
Yeah, I never thought about isomerization. I thought it needed stronger bases like KOH and CaO. Ammonia and methylamine aren't as strong. The bomb process also seems to produce tar, too, (I don't know if the amine is a solid or not) so it looks like you have some competing reactions. Maybe this type of process is good if you already have a bomb or autoclave and just want to do some quick experiments with various essential oils. http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6 http://www.privacy.org/ |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | jim (Hive Bee) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-13-01 06:19 | ||||
| Post No | 183698 | ||||
I have begun to look at the patents again. Patents 4,937,383 and 4,827,031 look good. HOWEVER, I still am wary about the isomerization, but they look easy to test. # 4,827,031 doesn't look as promising, the pressures are higher, it quotes use for compounds 2-8 carbons long, and uses slightly higher temperatures. # 4,937,383 looks more promising. The pressures seem attainable. The yields are well below 50% though. US Patents # 5,107,027 and # 5,900,508 seem not too good. The zeolites, if you can get them, are pretty acidic and might cause ether cleavage and will cause some polyermization. The patents do state however that they can aminate compounds 2-10 carbons long, even with aryl groups. The patent DO NOT tell you weather the addition id Markinokovian though, which is of great importance. If anyone can figure that out please post it... |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | thunker (Stranger) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-24-01 10:09 | ||||
| Post No | 186323 | ||||
How about this untested variation on your idea. I don't know if this is original or not -- I've never found it in the literature. If it doesn't work, I'd appreciate knowing the reason why. If it does work ... A HEAVY stainless steel pipe bomb is prepared. The bomb is charged with safrole, an equimolar amount of glycine, some amount of carbon dioxide in the form of dry ice pellets, and a catalyst, as described elsewhere in this thread. The pipe is flushed with carbon dioxide, then sealed. The sealed bomb is heated to ~32-49 degrees C and held for several hours. Here's the theory: The carbon dioxide turns to gas, then the combination of the containment pressure and temperature causes the CO2 to enter the supercritical region, forming an excellent solvent for the reaction to follow. Under these conditions, the glycine decarboxylates over the course of about two hours, yielding methylamine and more carbon dioxide, which adds to the solvent. Finally, the methylamine and safrole condense, yielding, hopefully, MDMA. When the reaction is complete, the pipe is cooled, first in air, then in ice water, then in acetone/dry ice. The terrified chemist then carefully releases the pressure by unscrewing the cap. The drop in pressure solidifies most of the CO2. Once the pressure is released, the cap is removed, and the pipe is placed in a contained vessel. A tube runs from the containment vessel through a beaker of dilute HCl. First, the carbon dioxide vaporizes away, then any remaining methyamine vaporizes, and is captured in the HCl beaker and precipitated as the hydrochloride. What remains in the pipe is hopefully MDMA freebase, ready to be purified and gassed. |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | foxy2 (Hive Addict) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-24-01 13:42 | ||||
| Post No | 186387 | ||||
That is an awsome idea, add a touch of acetone~1ml to aid in the decarboxylation maybe. And some ammonium sulphate catalyst. Those pipe bombs scare the shit outta Foxy too though Someone needs to try this. You could potentially take undistilled sassy and make E with NO glassware and very little apparatus Do Your Part To Win The War |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | Day_Trippah (Stranger) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-26-01 14:45 | ||||
| Post No | 186940 | ||||
LOL i like the part about the terrified chemist. I have to say though that this is the coolest shit i have ever read. if this works and it looks like it can, the DEA just got buttfucked. |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole+bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | PolytheneSam (Hive Addict) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-27-01 23:31 | ||||
| Post No | 187303 | ||||
The temperature is what drives the reaction not the pressure. The reason for the bomb is to contain the water and ammonia (or amine) because it would evaporate without it. OK, if you start with 20 g of CO2 as dry ice in your modification, thunker, what would the pressure be in a 250ml bomb when it turns to a gas at 32-49°? Use the ideal gas equation, PV=nRT. Also, if you want you can try Van der Waal's equation, too. http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6 http://www.privacy.org/ |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | foxy2 (Hive Addict) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-28-01 01:37 | ||||
| Post No | 187323 | ||||
Yea Sam has a point. It would bee best to use a high boiling inert solvent for the bomb instead of CO2 Hmmm para-Dichlorobenzene? Insoluable in water, otc, easy to wash away with dcm in A/B extraction, boils at 173.4C, melts at 56C. Heat to 190C or so and away we go. Pressure probably wouldn't bee an issue becasue the para should stay liquid up to 200C under minimal pressure. This idea is COOL!!! Do Your Part To Win The War |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | jim (Hive Bee) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-28-01 03:04 | ||||
| Post No | 187342 | ||||
Halide replacement by the amine would be a problem with para-dichlorobenzene... The pressure in the "bomb" with raise the boiling point of the solvent. The CO2 could in a a liquid form (supercritical actually) at these high temperaures if the pressure was great enough. I have grave reservations about using clandestine chemistry bombs, I would fear for my life. I would also put at least 2 pressure saftey blow-off valve and a pressure release valve to release pressure when taking off the lid. |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | PolytheneSam (Hive Addict) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-28-01 03:26 | ||||
| Post No | 187345 | ||||
The vapor pressure of water at 250° C is 27 atm. In P. Chem. lab we were filling bomb calorimeters with 25 atm of O2 before igniting the samples. http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6 http://www.privacy.org/ |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | Day_Trippah (Stranger) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-28-01 16:19 | ||||
| Post No | 187508 | ||||
So are you saying the bomb would blow? |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | foxy2 (Hive Addict) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-28-01 18:26 | ||||
| Post No | 187548 | ||||
sam those bombs in pchem lab are fucking thick and heavy duty!!!! Do Your Part To Win The War |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | PolytheneSam (Master Searcher) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-29-01 08:11 | ||||
| Post No | 187679 | ||||
Referring to:
http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6 http://www.privacy.org/ |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole bomb?happy chinaman | Reply | |||
| Posted by | Day_Trippah (Stranger) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-29-01 13:06 | ||||
| Post No | 187753 | ||||
oh |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole bomb?happy chinaman ![]() |
Reply | |||
| Posted by | Day_Trippah (Stranger) | ||||
| Posted on | 04-30-01 09:54 | ||||
| Post No | 187967 | ||||
SWIM will try it if someone would tell SWIM what the fuck glycine is and where/if SWIM can buy it and also the current statis on sassafrass oil legal/illegal |
|||||
| Subject | Re: safrole bomb?happy chinaman ![]() |
Reply | |||
| Posted by | PolytheneSam (Master Searcher) | ||||
| Posted on | 07-11-01 08:23 | ||||
| Post No | 189903 | ||||
I found a patent (US 2449644) on direct amination of stryrenes, propenylbenzenes, etc. using an amine and sodium. Note the structure in column 2 of the patent: Ar-CR=CH-R' If Ar was 3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl, R was H and R' was methyl you should get MDMA. Here's a new page I made http://www.geocities.com/dritte123/Miscp http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6 http://www.privacy.org/ |
|||||